Skip to main content
AI Studio  add-on for Spider.
d-nb.info · HTTP 200

D-nb Scraper

Spider read d-nb.info in 2.3 s without a browser and returned 200 lines of clean markdown, including sections like "Page 1", "Page 20" and "Page 21".

Get your free API key
Free balance on signup No card. Failed requests cost $0.
Response d-nb.info/1306605261/34.md markdown · 200 lines
4.6Generationalsimilaritiesanddi fferencesInconsideringRQ2(whichofthesixfactorseachgenerationfeltweremore importantinperceivingSMIauthenticity),the analysisfoundboth generations prioritized accuracyandconnectednessas keysinwhichtheyperceivein fluencerauthenticity,the waythesethemeswerediscusseddemonstratedthatthe two generationshavedi fferentexpectationsofwhatconstitutes SMIauthenticity.While thereweremanysimilaritiesbetweenthetwo generations, theGenZgroupstalked aboutin fluencersasknowledgeablefriends,personalconnectionsfromwhich followers couldcountongainingeducationandentertainment. Millennials,onthe otherhand,sawin fluencers asdesirablecomradesandworkingprofessionalswith whomMillennialscouldlive vicariouslythrough.Thisperception ofanin fluencer’srolewas themostvisibledi fference inhowGenZandMillennialsconnectedwithand viewedin fluencers.5Discussion Aswith previousresearch,our findingsindicatethatperceivedauthenticityis importanttosocialmediausers ofdi fferentgenerations(Mooreetal.2018).However, thedi fferingexpectationsofin fluencersbyGenZandMillennialscontextualized how eachgenerationconceptualizedauthenticity,how authenticitycouldbe demonstratedbyin fluencers,andhoweachof theNunes etal.(2021)factorsfor authenticitywereprioritized.Bothgenerationsplacedgreat emphasis onperceived authenticity,asshowninthefocusgroups.However,inviewing in fluencers di ffer-ently(friendvs.comrade),thetechniques successfulin fluencersusedtotargettheir specificaudiencevariedjustasmuch.Further,whileboth generationsplaced somewhatsimilarweight on eachofthesixfactorsofauthenticity(with accuracyand connectednessbeingmoreimportantthantheothers),thereweregreat di fferencesinhoweachcriterionexhibiteditselfbetweenthetwocohorts. Forinstance,GenZ participantsusedconnectednesstoexpresspersonalconnectionwiththein fluencer.Ontheotherhand,Millennialparticipantsusedconnectednesstoexpressa ffinityfor anin fluencer’s contentand acknowledgmentoftheircareer.As such,understanding influencerauthenticity requiresattentiontowhat theindividualor groupexpects fromanin fluencer.Thisisparticularlyimportantwhenlookingtounderstandhow tomarketbrandsandproductse fficientlytodevelop connectionbetweenabrand andconsumers. Currently, manyin fluencernormsseemtailoredtoaMillennial ’sviewof influencerexpectations;in fluencersactively pushingproductsontheir followers,Authenticityde finedbyGenZandMillennials 369# Page 20seeminglyactinglikelivereviews,whichis fittingforaMillennialaudiencewhoare lookingtogaininformationratherthan ‘hangout ’withfriends.However,asGenZis concernedprimarilywithpersonalrelationships,productreviewswouldseemto impedetheperceptionofauthenticity(Hund2019).AsGenZslowlybecomesthe largestconsumergroup,in fluencerswillneed to adaptto representthisshiftin perception,phasing outofproduct reviews andrelyingonotherways tomarketa producttothosewhowant toconnectbefore beingin fluenced.De-influencingmaybepartofthisculturalshift.Interestingly,mostofthe participants inbothgenerationalgroupsfeltthatde-in fluencingwaspositive.The GenZgroupssawde-in fluencingasafriendlookingoutforotherfriends,o fferingtipsandknowledgetosave money, hittingboth thepersonal connectionand educationalcomponents thatGenZlooksforfromin fluencers.Millennials,onthe otherhand,appreciated de-in fluencingbut sawitasanotherformof anonline review,thoughone thatcouldadditionallysavemoney.Whereactivelyselling was acceptedbyMillennialsandrejectedbyGenZ,de-in fluencing hitasweetspotthat createdaperception ofauthenticityforbothgenerationsmostlikelybecause ofthe negativeconnotationsurroundingin fluencersassalespeople.Activesellingwas broughtupbybothgenerationsas aproblemwithin fluencers.TheGenZgroups, seeingin fluencers as friends,seemedadamantly againstbeingthetargetofadver- tisements.However, eventheMillennials,whoseeminglyacknowledgedsalesaspart ofanin fluencer’sjob,considereditrefreshingwhentheywerenottoldtopurchase something.Allgroupswereunhappywhenexplicitly toldtopurchase something. Still,noparticipantsreferredtoin fluencersusingaproductasaproblem,whichisa verycommonmethodin fluencersuse in advertising.For instance,manygaming influencerssimplyplayvideogames onTwitch,morepassively encouragingsales evenwhentheydonotobviously ‘advertise’thegames(Socially2023;Woodcockand Johnson2019). For manyparticipants,salespitcheswereat bestexpected,and,at worst, a reasontostopfollowinganin fluencer. However,advertising,whendoneina generation-specificmanner,suchassharingpassionsor allowingaudiencestolive vicariouslythrough thein fluencer’s experiences,werewelcomedand evenareason forsometosubscribedorfollowanin fluencer. Asresearchcontinuestogrow surroundingin fluencersand authenticity,itisimportantnotjusttoanalyzethem as awholebuttodoso inconjunctionwiththeiraudience.Additionally,anygenera- tionalchanges inanin fluencer’s audiencecanleadtoimportantdistinctionsinhow anin fluencerisexpectedto connectwiththeir followersto maintain asenseof authenticityandtheabilitytoe ffectivelypersuade. 370 Singeretal.# Page 215.1Globalimplications Itisessentialthatglobalmarketersunderstandtheirtargetmarketstoe ffectivelyreachtheiraudienceandunderstandhowtheirmessagesare beingperceived, includingunderstandinghowthe di fferentgeneration ’sviewSMIauthenticity, toensuretheidealSMIsare employed.Assuch,thisresearchaidsbrandsand companiestarget membersofGenZandMillennialsutilizingin fluencers.For example, basedontheresearch findings,brandswantingto connectwithGenZ consumersshouldconsiderSMIswhoareperceivedas friendsandcanteachtheir followers.Onthe otherhand,ifabrand orcompanyislookingtopromoteto Millennials,theywould wantto considercontentcreatorswhoconnectthrough vicariousexperiencesandwhoarethoughtofasmoreutilitarianratherthan friendly.ItisexpectedthatasGenZgrowsolderandbegins toentertheworkforceand outspendothergenerations(Flores-Marquez2023),theiruseofdigitaldeviceevolves fromprimarilysocialandentertainmentpurposestoincludeproductresearchand discovery(Petrock2021;Yaqub2023).Thisusewouldsuggesttheywillcontinueto turntotheirdevicestohelpmakeconsumerdecisions,veryoften lookingtoSMIsto helpthemmakepurchase decisions (Meta2022; TikTokFor Business2023; Yaqub 2023).Businesspredictionsindicateglobalin fluencermarketingspending willin- creasefrom$16.4billionin2022to$84.89billionby 2028(Santora2022).Withsurveys andresearchrevealingglobalconsumersprefer amore “empathic”andpersonal levelofmarketingwithbrandsand companiesthrough SMIs(DeloitteInsights2020; Hund2019;Rahilly2020),selectingtherightSMIiscriticaltotheoverallsuccessof any campaignandcompany ’sbottomline(Walsh 2018). 6Limitationsandfuture research Wenotethatalthoughcleardi fferencesweredocumented betweenthegenerational focus groupsandsaturationwas met,thesamplewas takenfromcollegestudentsata singleuniversity.Futureresearchshouldexpandtheparticipantsampletoincor- poratebothstudentsfromdi fferenteducationalinstitutionsandnon-studentsto includetheopinionofconsumersalreadyinthefull-timeworkforce.Additionally, futureresearchcouldexpandthegenerationalparticipantstoexploredi fferencesin perceivedSMIauthenticitywith othergenerations,includingGenX,Boomers, Silents,andPolars.Potentialresearchshouldincludealargerquantitativeexami- nationofthesix-factor model(Nunesetal. 2021)todetermineifthisstudy ’sfindingscanbe generalizedtoabroader sample.AlthoughthegenderoftheparticipantsdidAuthenticityde finedbyGenZandMillennials 371# Page 22notshowdi fferencesinperceivedauthenticity,mostparticipantswerewomen (68%).Futureresearchwouldbene fitfrom includingmoremale participants and investigatingwhetherthe genderofthe SMIisafactorperceivedauthenticity. Thegenerationalthemesthatemergedin thisresearchalongwithexperimental conditionscouldbeusedtoguidefutureresearchtofurtherexaminegenerational perceptionsofSMIauthenticity.Additionally,thisstudyfocusedprimarilyonlife- stylein fluencersafterthede-in fluencingmovement thattookplaceinfall2022.It wouldbeworthinvestigatingdi fferenttypesofin fluencers (i.e.,gaming, financial,etc.)todetermineifsimilartrendsconsistthroughoutmultiplegenres ofsocialmedia influencing.Acknowledgments:TheauthorswouldliketothankVybhaviGopalakrishna Anuradhaforhercontributiontotheresearchandhelpwiththefocusgroup. Disclosurestatement: Theauthorsreporttherearenocompetingintereststo declare.References Atske,Sara.2022. Socialmediausein2021. Washington,DC:Pew Research Center:Internet,Science&Tech. Availableat:https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/. Audrezet,Alice,Gwarlann deKerviler&JulieGuidryMoulard.2020.Authenticityunderthreat:Whensocial mediain fluencersneedtogobeyondself-presentation. Journal of BusinessResearch 117. 557 –569.Balaban,DeliaCristina&JuliaSzambolics.2022.Aproposedmodelof self-perceived authenticityof social mediain fluencers.MediaandCommunication 10(1).235 –246.Banet-Weiser,Sarah. 2012. Authentic: Thepoliticsofambivalenceinabrandculture .NewYork,NY:NewYork UniversityPress. Becker,Maren, NicoWiegand&Werner J.Reinartz.2019.Doesitpayto be real? Understanding authenticityinTVadvertising. JournalofMarketing 83(1).24 –50.Beverland,MichaelB.2005. Craftingbrandauthenticity:Thecaseof luxurywines. JournalofManagement Studies42(5).1003 –1029.Beverland,MichaelB.2006.The ‘realthing ’:Brandingauthenticityintheluxurywinetrade. Journalof BusinessResearch 59(2).251 –258.Beverland,MichaelB.,AdamLindgreen &MichielW.Vink. 2008.Projectingauthenticitythrough advertising:Consumerjudgmentsofadvertisers ’claims.JournalofAdvertising 37(1).5 –15.Beverland,MichaelB.&FrancisJ.Farrelly.2010.Thequestforauthenticityinconsumption:Consumers ’purposivechoiceofauthenticcuestoshape experiencedoutcomes. JournalofConsumerResearch 36(5).838 –856.Blanch-Bennett,Hari,TomLees &YasminMoeladi.2022. AuthenticallyconnectingyourbrandwithGenZand Millennials . London,UK: Kantar.Availableat:https://www.kantar.com/inspiration/brands/2022- authentically-connecting-your-brand-with-gen-z-and-millennials. Bramley,EllieViolet. 2023. Thesuddendawnofthedein fluencer:Canonlinesuperstarsstopusshopping? NewYork,NY:TheGuardianUS.https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2023/feb/22/the-sudden- dawn-of-the-dein fluencer-can-online-superstars-stop-us-shopping. 372 Singeretal.# Page 23Braun,Virginia &VictoriaClarke.2012.Thematicanalysis.In APAhandbookof researchmethodsin psychology,vol 2:Researchdesigns:Quantitative,qualitative,neuropsychological,andbiological ,vol.2, 57–71.Portland,OR:Ringgold,Inc. Breen,Bill.2007. Whodoyoulove?Theappeal –andrisks –of authenticity .NewYork,NY:FastCompany. Availableat:https://www.fastcompany.com/59489/who-do-you-love. Brooks,RobertC.1957. “Word-of-mouth ”advertising insellingnewproducts. JournalofMarketing 22(2).154–161.Brown,Stephen,RobertV. Kozinets&JohnF.Sherry Jr.2003.Teachingoldbrandsnewtricks:Retro brandingandtherevivalofbrandmeaning. JournalofMarketing 67(3).19 –33.Bulut,Sefa&DilaraMaraba.2021.GenerationZand itsperception ofworkthroughhabits,motivations, expectationspreferences,andworkethics. PsychologyandPsychotherapyResearch Study 4(4).1 –5.Carroll,GlennR.&DennisRayWheaton.2009.Theorganizationalconstructionofauthenticity: An examinationofcontemporaryfoodanddining intheU.S. ResearchinOrganizationalBehavior 29.255–282.Casaló,LuisV.,CarlosFlavián&SergioIbáñez-Sánchez.2020.In fluencersonInstagram:Antecedentsand consequencesofopinionleadership. Journal of BusinessResearch 117.510 –519.Cheung,ChristyM.K.,MathewK.O.Lee&DimpleR.Thadani.2009.Theimpactofpositiveelectronic word-of-mouthonConsumerOnlinePurchasingDecision.In Visioningandengineering theknowledge society.Awebscienceperspective,501 –510.Chiu,CandyLim&Han-ChiangHo. 2023.Impactofcelebrity,micro-celebrity,andvirtualin fluencerson ChineseGenZ ’spurchaseintentionthroughsocial media. SAGEOpen 13(1).https://doi.org/10.1177/ 21582440231164034. Dellatto,Marisa.2023. Influencerssold$3.6billionofgoodsin2022-Dysonairwrapand lululemonbeltbag led theway .Jersey City,NJ:Forbes.Available at:https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisadellatto/2023/01/ 17/influencers-sold-36-billion-of-goods-in-2022-dyson-airwrap-and-lululemon-belt-bag-led-the- way/?sh=55b88fa14bbb. Delmestri,Giuseppe, FabrizioMontanari&AlessandroUsai. 2005.Reputationandstrengthoftiesin predicting commercialsuccessandartisticmeritofindependents intheItalianfeature film industry. Journal of ManagementStudies 42(5).975 –1002.Deloitte Insights.2020. 2021globalmarketing trends .Stamford,CT:Deloitte DevelopmentLLC.Availableat: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/6963_global-marketing-trends/DI_ 2021-Global-Marketing-Trends_US.pdf. Demetry,Daphne.2019. Howorganizationsclaimauthenticity:Thecoproductionofillusionsin undergroundrestaurants. Organization Science 30(5).937 –960.DeVaney,SharonA.2015.UnderstandingtheMillennialgeneration. Journal of FinancialService Professionals 69(6).11 –14.DeVeirman,Marijke,VerolineCauberghe&LiselotHudders.2017.MarketingthroughInstagram influencers:Theimpactofnumberoffollowersandproductdivergenceonbrandattitude. InternationalJournal of Advertising 36(5).798 –828.Dimock,Michael.2019. Defininggenerations:WhereMillennialsendandGenerationZ begins .Washington, DC: PewResearchCenter.Availableat:https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/ where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/. Duffy,BrookeErin.2020. Socialmedia in fluencers.In Theinternationalencyclopediaofgender,media,and communication ,1–4.Hoboken, NJ:JohnWiley&Sons,Inc. Enberg,Jasmine.2022.In fluencer marketing:Spendingrisesamideconomicuncertainty,andTikTokgains oncompetitors .NewYork,NY:InsiderIntelligence.Availableat:https://on.emarketer.com/rs/867- SLG-901/images/eMarketer%20In fluencer%20Marketing%20Report%202022.pdf. Authenticityde finedbyGenZandMillennials 373
Code · Fields · Cost · Run it keyless, no account

The same call, in code.

The capture above came back as markdown. These examples add a key, so you get browser rendering, proxies, and concurrency on d-nb.info.

d-nb-info-scraper.ts
import { SpiderBrowser } from "spider-browser";

const spider = new SpiderBrowser({
  apiKey: process.env.SPIDER_API_KEY!,
});

await spider.connect();
const page = spider.page!;
await page.goto("https://d-nb.info");

// No selectors, no schema. Spider reads the page and names the fields.
const data = await page.scrape();

console.log(data);
await spider.close();
ready to run · spider-browser, no selectors

Ready for volume? Get an API key →

Fields you can pull.

Business NameAddressPhoneCategory

Spider names these from the page. The capture above came back as markdown; the same call with return_format: "json" returns them as keys.

What d-nb.info costs to scrape.

The capture above cost $0.001252 to fetch. Pricing is $1 per GB of pre-transformation bandwidth plus $0.001 per CPU minute, so a page like this one lands at a fraction of a cent. Failed requests are billed at $0.

  • Free balance on signup
  • No card required to test
  • Balance never expires
See the full pricing →

Run it keyless, no account

curl -X POST https://api.spider.cloud/scrape -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"url": "https://d-nb.info/1306605261/34", "return_format": "markdown"}'

More Directories scrapers.

Start scraping d-nb.info.

You already have the call. A key raises the rate limit and turns on browser rendering, proxies, and concurrency. Balance never expires, and top-ups go through secure checkout.