filestackapi.com, as data

Skloot emphasis facts about Henrietta’s life and death to illustrate that she was a person, one whom we can sympa thize with.When Henrietta was diagnosed with cancer, her husband and their five children “three still in diapers, waited in the car. ”Body Paragraph 2: Discuss the #2 element of Skloot’s style that will be compared/contrasted.Skloot employs diction to show the reader that the science behind HeLa cells should be understood by everyone.Examples from Text: “pretty sure she would be shocked”, “vicious case”, use of first and second person.Body Paragraph 3 Discuss the #3 element of Skloot’s style that will be compared/contrasted.Skloot uses figurative language to explain the science in terms that anyone, especially doctors would Examples from Text:Cytoplasm buzzes like a New York City stree t.# Page 3Body Paragraph 4 Transition and describe how the science writer’s style differs from Skloot’s style.Robert Truong and his colleagues use an academic style, which is dissimilar to Skloot because it emphasizes that they are communicating toa specific audience, a scholarly audience.“Several considerations mitigate against the claim that patients such as Lacks or DF should be offered financial compensation for use of their residual clinical tissue”Conclusion Paragrap h 5 Conclusion:Describe the effect of Skloot’s emphasis on the story of Henrietta Lacks. What does this portrayal reveal about bioethics, the study of ethic that arises from advancements in science or medicine ?Skloot’s portrayal of Henrietta’s story shows that the humanity of bioethics should be emphasized ahead of the medical industrial complex’s race to sell a cure.Call to action: What conclusion should the reader draw from these claims? What should society do as aresult of this debate? How is this relevant to society and science/technology?Society should be cautious of anytime a human’s parts are considered separated from the humanity of the person who created those parts.